Introduction


‘Modern idealism, if it asserts any general conclusion about the universe at all, asserts that it is spiritual … For my own part I wish it to be clearly understood that I do not suppose that anything I shall say has the smallest tendency to prove that reality is not spiritual: I do not believe it possible to refute a single one of the many important propositions contained in the assertion that it is so. Reality may be spiritual, for all I know; and I sincerely hope it is.’  G E Moore

The above paragraph is my favourite extract written by an academic philosopher. The reason I like it so much is because it is profoundly true, simple as that. 

Essentially what Moore (1873-1958) is saying in this introduction to On the Refutation of Idealism, is that though the work which is to follow is an argument for not accepting the truth of idealism, or in layman’s terms, the truth there is life after death, he wants to make it clear that though it is correct to challenge those who say there is life after death, it does not mean they are definitely wrong and there is not perhaps life after death.

He states that the assertion of idealism is an ‘important proposition’ and I agree with him, because everything you want is important and to say you don’t want life after death in some shape or form is simply not telling the truth. The extract ends perfectly too, because Moore states he ‘sincerely hopes’ there is life after death, which is the embracing of honesty on the subject.
 
One of my favourite TV programmes is Room 101 where people choose a pet hate they want to dispel forever and for me this has to be people's incorrect opinions about death, not only in terms of what is believed to happen, but also in terms of what is hoped happens too.
 
For me the answer to these questions is simply a matter of truthfulness and it is clear there is only one truthful answer for each of the questions. To help explain what I mean by this, please consider the following questions and table of answers:
 
On the matter of death, what do you believe in and what do you hope for out of non-reincarnation/resurrection, reincarnation, resurrection, or any imaginable number/combination of the above, depending upon, or not depending upon your morality?


The standard atheist position on the matter of death i.e. materialism
The standard pantheist position on the matter of death e.g. Hinduism, Buddhism.
The standard monotheist position on the matter of death e.g. Judaism, Christianity, Islam
The truthful position on the matter of death i.e. being philosophical
On the matter of death what do you believe in…
Non-reincarnation/resurrection, whatever your morality
Reincarnation, the quality depending upon your judged individual morality 
Resurrection, the quality depending upon your judged individual morality
The truth cannot be known and never will be known i.e. scientific / non-prophetic / humble
On the matter of death what do you hope for…
There is no hope of anything other than non-reincarnation/resurrection i.e. non-spiritual / non-religious
Non-reincarnation/resurrection, because of your judged individual morality
Resurrection into a non-evolutionary Heaven. 

(Consider: Can you imagine this being better than the box to the right?)
Reincarnation onto an evolutionary Earth of unanimous non-poverty and democracy i.e. depending upon our non-judged and specific collective morality
     
I believe the vast majority of people would put themselves in what I consider are the untruthful non-bold categories above and this I find thoroughly annoying, because the established truths are not widely understood and emphasised.

I would suggest thinking about death truth can be equated to thinking about arithmetic truth. 

What I mean is, consider how annoyed you'd be if when you asked what 7 x 8 equals, the only answers you got were 55, 57 or 58 i.e. the standard positions above. Would this ignorance not drive you to try and spread the word that 7 x 8 equals 56 i.e. the truthful position above? It might also motivate you to put the correct answer in a table on a website named www.arithmetictruth.net or entitled something else equally appropriate!

It can also be agreed that this striving to emphasise arithmetic truth would be a teaching and not preaching and equivalently I would suggest the truth about death is a teaching and not preaching too. Also, just like arithmetic truth, I believe the truth about death is not particularly difficult to understand, yet is not understood by anyone until examined.

I hope the works that follow serve as this examination and that the reader will in the end agree, if they do not already do so, that what is contained in bold in the above table is the truth on the matter.
 

Mother Nature's Garden

An Investigation Into the Nature of Our True Hope in Death

As the title would suggest, the purpose of this essay is to address the nature of our true hope in death. The reason I say ‘our’ true hope in death, is because I believe we all have an identical real and truthful hope in death, irrespective of our cultural background. My objective is to make this apparent through my use of symbolic representation or allegory I have entitled Mother Nature’s Garden.

Before I introduce this allegory, I feel I must firstly elaborate on my reasons for taking on the topic in question. Well the truth is I have felt compelled to take this subject matter on for some time now, because for me it is about being truthful with ourselves and the truth in relation to the nature of our hope in death has to my knowledge not been fully expressed previously.

In addition to this, I think the matter is more important than the more popularly considered belief in death investigation, which I believe is a waste of time considering, because the truth is already known that the scientific method cannot prove what happens in death and never will be able to be prove what happens in death, as our ability to experience conscious reflection is a subjective and not an objective matter.

It is for the above reason I would contend our true hope in death is not an impossible hope whatever that hope might be and this is important to understand, because not to understand this may be a source of depression in the sense it is the acceptance of what we don’t want. The purpose of this essay though is to attempt to convince the reader that what I suggest is our true hope in death is just that and is not in fact a false hope, meaning, there is not in fact a greater hope in death than what I have suggested through my investigation.

The reason why I have chosen to use allegory to help communicate my thoughts on this subject is because it has helped me create a more coherent argument. The allegory is framed to symbolically represent the Universe equivalently as a vast Garden, which must be imagined as having a very distinct climatology in respect to time and I shall elaborate upon this now.

At the beginning of the day, or more specifically at the stroke of midnight, the Garden always experiences the worst possible weather, with thunder and lightning prevalent. This weather improves, but the rain is constant up until the point of dawn in the morning, when it begins to subside and stops just as the sun rises. From this point onwards there is then no rain and complete sunshine right up until the point of sunset, when it begins again and builds up throughout the evening to the climax of a storm again at midnight.

As to what is in contained within this Garden, the only object of relevance  to the allegory is that there is a clothes line and it must be imagined that the Garden  itself is so vast that literally trillions of items of clothing could be hung on this clothes line in  it if this was required.

The Garden is frequented by a lady we shall appropriately name Mother Nature, who uses the following instructions for adding and removing clothing from the clothes line between the hours of sunrise and sunset when the sun is shining. These instructions serve to show the consequences of particular events in the Universe having equivalent events in the allegorical Garden and the instructions lay the foundation for my whole argument as to what is our true hope in death:

If an individual capable of experiencing conscious reflection in the natural course of their life is born into the Universe then new washed clothing goes on the peg on the clothes line which has gone the longest without holding clothing, or else new washed clothing goes on a new peg on the clothes line.

If an individual capable of experiencing conscious reflection in the natural course of their life dies in the Universe then clothing comes off the peg on the clothes line, leaving the peg remaining and the clothing never returns to the clothes line. However, so long as there are pegs on the clothes line then there shall always be clothing for them.

The length of time it takes for a single item of clothing to dry on the clothes line is the maximum possible life span of an individual capable of experiencing conscious reflection in the natural course of their life.

For the ease of explaining how this allegory can be used to communicate what I would deem is our true hope in death, a couple of assumptions are required to be made. The first assumption is that the Universe we experience now is the first of its kind and there has not been a prior big bang and big crunch of an earlier Universe. The second assumption is that in any particularly created Universe there shall only be one species capable of experiencing conscious reflection before the Universe ends; so in the case of our Universe, it is only human beings that are granted this privilege.

Of course I am quite open to the possibility both these assumptions are in reality unfounded, but it is important to note that if they are, they do not affect the actual ability of the allegory to portray the present reality in the Universe. What I mean for instance, is that if pre-our-own-Universe species, Neanderthals, cats, dogs and dolphins were and are capable of conscious reflection in the natural course of their lives, then it just means that in allegorical terms I cannot describe the estimated amount of clothing and pegs on the clothes line at any one time very easily.

This is why the assumptions have been made and so if we put together the allegory in the context of these assumptions, with the help of ‘Historical Estimates of World Population’ data retrieved from the US Central Bureau 2010, the story of our Universe can be told which reflects a single day in the Garden up to our present moment.

The beginning of the Universe is symbolically represented as being the point of thunder and lightning in the Garden at midnight. In real terms this is the point when it would be most impossible for anything to survive in the cosmos, so if Mother Nature put out clothes at this point there would be no chance of drying/survival in this environment and of course this is the case because there are no hospitable planets or habitats for plants and animals to evolve into, let alone stars or galaxies of stars.

In the symbolic representation the weather improves as the sunrise approaches, but there is still constant rain and it is only just before dawn that the rain almost stops. This was perhaps around about a million years ago when there were many competing pre-human species still incapable of conscious reflection as we know it, the reason being perhaps they lacked the technology such as weapons and fire to create the freedom necessary to enable conscious reflection any earlier than it occurred in reality.

We shall never know the exact time human beings became capable of experiencing conscious reflection in the natural course of their lives, but the important thing is that this moment in the Universe is represented as being the point of sunrise in the Garden and the point when Mother Nature begin adhering to her rules, which are hanging and removing clothes as per the instructions given.

When the first individual capable of conscious reflection in the natural course of their life was born into the Universe, the first peg and clothing was added to the clothes line and so Mother Nature’s working day began.

In a particular moment on Earth around about twelve thousand years ago, there would have been approximately one million pegs on the clothes line. This number of pegs on the clothes line reflects the maximum population of those capable of conscious reflection in the Universe. In these ancient times, humans would have been predominantly hunter gatherers and the population would have remained fairly constant.  

However, the coming of the Agricultural Age would have meant the amount of pegs on the line growing to twenty five million by the time of the first known civilizations developing approximately five thousand years ago. At any particular moment in time in the synonymous Garden before five thousand years ago, the amount of clothing on the pegs would also always be close to the total amount of pegs on the clothes line, reflecting the population growth of humanity over this period.

In fact, if we take any moment in the synonymous Garden from between roughly twelve thousand years ago right up until to the present moment, there would only be very few instances when there would be a considerable amount of empty pegs on the clothes line, perhaps only in times of great plague in the world. Regardless of these events, the population has grown so rapidly that at some point in time a few hundred years ago, the Universal reality would be represented in allegorical terms as the billionth peg and clothing being placed on the clothes line in the Garden.

In more recent history and more specifically since the Industrial Revolution, there has been exponential growth in the world population and so at this very moment in the Universal reality there would equivalently be over seven billion pegs on the line in the allegorical Garden.

As to the future, it is certain in the short term that human population will increase and that might be up to as much as fourteen billion within the next hundred years on UN 2004 estimates. The only other certainty beyond this is that the inevitable sunset will come to the Garden which is equivalent to the extinction of the human species in the Universal reality, along with the rest of the galaxies, stars and other finite entities of the Universe.

At this point we know that synonymously in the Garden there shall be at least seven billion pegs on the clothes line when all the stars and the planets cease to exist in the Universe. As per Mother Nature’s instruction in regard to the fact that if there are pegs there shall always be clothing for them, this means that these pegs would remain on the clothes line in the Garden and be available for clothes to be hung on them the next day when the sunshine returns.

In allegorical terms the clothes Mother Nature puts out on the clothes line the next day, meaning in the next Universal big bang/big crunch cycle, would be brand new clothes and they would represent a newly evolved species, perhaps very like our own, perhaps not, but the essential characteristic of the species would be that they would be able to experience conscious reflection in the natural course of their lives just like is the case with our own species.

Also like the human race, this species would reach a peak population which might mean the number of pegs on the clothes line increases from the amount that exist on the clothes line at the end of this Universe, but then in real terms this species would also become extinct. However, because there would always be at least seven billion pegs on the clothes line, the days of Mother Nature hanging clothes on the line in the Garden would continue indefinitely.

*

Now I have introduced the allegory from a macro-perspective and given an overview of its working in relation to the hope for the Universe as a whole, I must continue by explaining exactly how this fits into the context of the investigation being made and what I would contend is our true hope in death. To do this I must look at the allegory from a micro-perspective, so as to investigate our beliefs, hopes and fears in more depth.

What most of us believe instinctively is that we are in allegorical terms items of clothing on the line. By the rules of the Garden our lives began at the moment of conception when we became entities able to experience conscious reflection in the natural course of our lives. This is represented in allegorical terms as when Mother Nature placed a new item of clothing onto an old peg on the clothes line, or when she placed a new item of clothing along with a new peg onto the line.

What we all experience is that we are clothing on the line, born with a potential life span of up to about one hundred years of age. We all know that in principal we have the potential to live happy lives right up until to the moment of our deaths and this is synonymous to our being allegorical clothes on the line, drying and becoming dry after living a maximum possible life span – the just rewards of good decision making in life, not to mention a hefty portion of good fortune also!

The natural fear is that when death comes, because what we perceive ourselves as being most essentially is the item of clothing we experience, then death shall mean there will be complete cessation of consciousness after the event, for in allegorical terms when items of clothing are removed from the clothes line they never return to it in the future.

To put it straight, I would contend this is certainly not the true hope in death of anyone, for what I would contend is the true hope in death of everyone, is that what we are essentially in the allegorical example is a particular peg on the clothes line and not a particular item of clothing upon the line.

What this means if this is the reality, is that each and every one of us has most probably lived a number of past lives, even though these cannot be remembered; for it is new washed clothing that always goes on the pegs on the line and these pegs never receive old clothing. If we reflect on whether this aspect of potential reality would be our true hope in death, I consider it is, because I believe to have knowledge of former lives would not be beneficial to our present life, most obviously because of the fact knowledge of former deaths would be a definite cause of potential trauma in our present life, irrespective of how good our previous lives were.

What being a peg on the clothes line would mean for us in real terms is that at any point of time in the future we would be experiencing, or soon to again be experiencing a life and hence have the constant opportunity to experience the only happiness we know, namely evolutionary happiness.

This is the primary reason why I believe the allegorical hope in life is to be a peg on the clothes line in the Garden, meaning that in the Universe we shall continually experience beings capable of experiencing conscious reflection in the natural course of their lives and with no knowledge of previous lives.

My first challenge is of course to try and convince the reader that the real hope in death is not alternatively that of going to a non-evolutionary Heaven after death.  Well in my opinion the major problem with the idea of a non-evolutionary Heaven lies in the inability to actually conceive in reality how we could possibly be happy there.

What I mean is, if you can’t die then there is no purpose to life, as it is quite obvious to me that the alleviation of need is the creating of happiness in life. Consider for instance alleviating physiological, safety, belonging and esteem needs. Fulfilling these needs equates to the fulfilling of happiness and in allegorical terms this is the drying of clothing on the line.

In a world such as an imagined non-evolutionary Heaven, where roles such as being parents and grandparents would surely disappear, the allegorical equivalent is that all the clothes on the line remain there already dry and so just like there is no purpose to clothing being on the line in the allegory when they are already dry, what is the purpose and joy of ourselves living in a non-evolutionary reality?

To continue this theme, the truth is that if you take away evolutionary purpose and need then what do you have? For instance, can we really imagine music and dance detached from the sexual impulse integral to the continuation of evolutionary existence? It can easily be said that this is what Heaven offers too, but to me it is clear that this definition of Heaven is in actual fact the projection of perfection for ourselves on Earths.

Further to this, what we know as beauty, comedy and sublimity in what we experience cannot be imagined as Heavenly traits when just a little thought is given to the situation, because our imagination can only frame the experience in an Earthly context. This is most obviously the case with sublimity, for the sublime is the awe of nature which could destroy us in any second. To really feel the sublime is to really feel the Earth in all its glory. An example might be climbing up a vast mountain, turning around and seeing the curvature of the Earth and feeling the sheer speckification of your being as you think to yourself, wow, how do I exist in this?

And what about the Earthly experience of love?  How could the feeling of love be imagined in a place where evolutionary altruism is not even required, a place it would seem where the evolutionary role of guardian for the species must be permanently extinguished in time?

I hope I have gone some way to successfully argue that the true hope in death is not to go to an imagined Heaven. Along with this explained false hope for Heaven, I must also consider what I believe to be the equally false hope never to be born again, which I must admit does have some rational foundation, because the truth is that if you or I were born of antiquity we would perhaps genuinely hope for this also, as it may be impossible to imagine in long periods of plague, poverty, war, or tyranny, being able to live a maximum possible life span.    

Though this is the case, I think our thought would lack the perspective of hindsight we now have and the imagination to see that life expectancy can increase through for instance technological innovation and government will and I think if an individual of antiquity who felt the pain of plague, poverty, war, or tyranny, was told they could be born again into a world of democracy and non-poverty and where their former life would be forgotten, they would most certainly take this over not having another life.

I totally understand there may still be despair in what I propose is the true hope in death, because life expectancy in the world is still relatively low and in allegorical terms the average item of clothing is removed by Mother Nature only three-quarters dry. Indeed, there are many places on the Earth where in allegorical terms the clothes are coming off the clothes line only half dry, meaning in real terms there is the continuous pain of unfulfilled lives and lives where it is difficult to reach even a child rearing age.

What I must say at this point however, is that I made an assumption earlier in the essay which was intended to help me communicate my point easier, but on serious reflection I don’t believe is the case for certain. That assumption is in regard to our species being the only one past, present and future in the history of this Universe that is capable of experiencing conscious reflection before the Universe itself ends.

This assumption I consider doubtful, not because I truly believe other animals that have since become extinct on this Earth, or other animals that still occupy this Earth, were or are able to experience conscious reflection in the natural course of their lives, but because I truly believe that at this very moment there are other species on other Earths in the Universe capable of conscious reflection in the natural course of theirs.

Simply considering the vast amount of stars in the sky and possible worlds behind these stars I believe warrants the opinion that at this very moment there are probably many more other species existing in the Universe and so in allegorical terms I would contend there is in actual fact more likely to be trillions and not billions of pegs on the clothes line in the Garden at this very moment.

What this means is that in relation to our true hope in death, the same hope is better than previously thought, because our own understanding of the history of the human race is that over time the average life expectancy at birth has increased. This coupled with the fact we know the human race is a relatively young species, means that on average I would suggest the experience of a different species would offer a better chance of higher life expectancy and hence a better chance of living a maximum life span and in seeing this potential for our children and grandchildren and more generally the children and grandchildren of that species.

What this hope in death requires to be true is for evolution to continuously create big bang/big crunch scenarios and evolve stars, planets, plants and animals to the point where there are constantly beings created capable of conscious reflection in the natural course of their lives.

Of course, it also requires a law in nature which cannot be verified or validated through the scientific method and in allegorical terms this idea of a law in nature is akin to Mother Nature being able to do absolutely anything she wanted in relation to hanging and removing particular pegs and clothing on or from the line. An example might be her putting clothing on another non-evolutionary line in the sun, where they are simply left to hang there in a dry state for eternity; this is the supposedly positive idea of a non-evolutionary Heaven.

The fear however is that there is no significant law in nature behind what is perceived as reality and in allegorical terms we are simply clothing on the line, destined to be removed from the line forever. Though this is certainly a distinct possibility, it cannot be said our hope in death which we have described through the allegory is an impossible hope, just like I would contend the hope for Heaven in death is not an impossible hope either, rather it is simply a false hope.

We all have fears in relation to our deaths and one of these fears is because the majority of us in the rich modern world love life, love music, love the purpose of life which presents itself through evolution. Hence, I would contend that in allegorical terms the majority of us instinctively want to be a peg on the clothes line in the Garden, for the simple reason this would mean we would then be able to carry on experiencing the things we love in the Universe.

To conclude then, the reality is there is hope in death, just like in the allegorical equivalent there is hope we could be a continuous peg on the clothes line instead of being a temporary item of clothing which comes off a peg on the clothes line. When I look at the stars, my thought is that there are many other species like our own, with the same hopes and fears. This reality would suggest the allegorical clothes line does not have billions of pegs, but instead has trillions of pegs upon it and if our hope is fulfilled then after we have exhausted our last breath on this planet every one of us shall have our next breath on another planet and it shall be a new beginning.

This, I would contend, is our great hope in death, the great hope that is not an impossible or false hope and shall never be proven to be.

Socrates' Dice


The below text, translated from an Ancient Greek dialect, was discovered during an excavation dig of a site near to the city of Athens in June, Two-Thousand-and-Eleven. Some believe the text to be a ‘lost dialogue’ between the philosophers Socrates and Plato, but this cannot be proven to be the case.

I visited Socrates on the night before his execution. He told me he had been given a gift by a merchant a few weeks before he was imprisoned. When he showed me the gift, he said it was what was called a dice and he told me the dice had given him comfort in light of his pending death.

To explain what he meant by this, Socrates asked me to throw the object. I did and a six came up. He then asked me whether I would bet a six would come up again on the next throw. I said I thought it more likely it would not be a six that came up, because there are six edges to the dice and therefore a greater chance of getting another number that was not six. When he asked me whether I thought a number greater than six would come up, I told him that this was quite preposterous as there were only six numbers visible on the faces of the dice.

Socrates then rolled the dice again and a six did come up. He told me I should have guessed this would happen, as it was my only experience and he then told me that if the dice is rolled a certain distance and at a certain pace, a six will always be the number that comes up, because the dice is loaded with a weight that grants this such.

I told Socrates I thought this impressive, but asked what this meant and why it should give him comfort. Socrates then told me that our experience in the world is like getting a six on the dice, so why should we bet against experiencing worlds like we do again and again, like throwing sixes again and again on the dice?

I told Socrates I thought he was wrong and that what was most likely is that a good life would lead to eternal bliss and a bad life to eternal torment, but he challenged me on this. He said that believing there will be worlds fundamentally different to what is evident, is like the preposterous prediction that a number greater than six can be thrown on a six sided dice. He also said that the individual morality of a person is probably an irrelevance, just like what you do before you throw the dice has absolutely no consequence on it's ensuing result; immediately after saying this, he told me this did not mean we should thus live immoral lives, as this is likely to not bring happiness in life, irrespective of what happens after we die.

He said the dice had taught him it is justifiable to live in hope there will be a continuation of life as we know it and he then proceeded to say that if this were the case it would mean not a continuation of life on this Earth, but on another Earth, because he thought the stars were suns like our sun and there were millions of them!

I thought Socrates had gone mad with his pending death nearing. He said that this belief gave him comfort, because he thought our societies on this Earth were not as perfect as they could be, because our peoples were young and inexperienced in the disciplines of politics and economics and there was a greater chance our future lives would be under the guardianship of wiser peoples in more just and equitable societies.

He said that yes, it may appear that the rolling of a one to five is more likely than a six on the dice, but people should live in faith of a six, as this was their experience, just like the fact something and not nothing is the reality of their situation.

He also said that those who speak of worlds fundamentally different from that which is evident should be dealt with warily, just like those who predict a number greater than six on a six sided dice should be treated warily also. He continued by saying those who say goodness will lead to heaven and badness to hell should be dealt with warily too, as this is perfectly equivalent to saying that the conduct before throwing a dice affects the outcome of the dice.

Socrates then turned to the question of God. He said that the importance of the question was only equal to the importance of whether the maker of the dice participates or not in the game and on reflection this is of no importance at all, because what is of most and real importance is what happens when you roll the dice and not who is watching, or who is suggesting what the outcome might be.

The honest person would not call themselves a God believer, a God disbeliever, or even someone who was unsure whether there was a God or not, because this is in truth not really saying anything at all in the context of what is important to be said on the subject of death.

The honest person would simply say they live in hope of life after death, because it is justified to do so and if the honest person heard anybody telling anybody else there isn’t hope of life after death then they should reprimand that individual, because it is feeding a lie and nothing other than this.

From what I recall, Socrates then preceded to say that the idea of reincarnation was exactly the same as thinking about the accumulated total when you keep throwing sixes on the dice. In other words, it is the same as thinking about the idea of infinity, as a total would never be reached. Resurrection on the other hand, could only be considered as a vast number resulting from a single throw of the dice, a number that could never be as ‘good’ as the continual throwing of sixes on the dice. He said there would always be those who suggested resurrection was better than reincarnation, but in all truth there cannot be a logical basis for this argument, just like there cannot be a logical basis for the argument any integer can be greater than the idea of infinity.

I did not know what to make of Socrates’ ramble and was taken aback by it. I asked him why he should feel comfort of living lives with the knowledge of death always prevalent, but to this he said he thought the knowledge of death defined life, defined why we love, as life is difficult and so to love is necessary in a difficult life and that an easy life would mean love would be naturally redundant within it.

I asked Socrates what he thought about not seeing his parents and grandparents again and he told me that the best thing for all people of old age and any age for that matter, was to be born again, because older people have a role for younger people, but in heaven age would be an irrelevance and so there would be alienation and not a role to play. He said there were two essential archetypes of child and guardian, which are the roles in life, of living a hedonistic lifestyle and the joys this can give and living an altruistic lifestyle and the joys this can give also. He said with utter conviction, without Earths like we experience here, how can these archetypes exist?

He followed by saying there should be particular wariness of those who say there cannot be life after death, because in all truth these people have no knowledge, just like there is no prior knowledge of what the dice will yield before it is thrown. He said that in many cases unhappy people are likely to suggest the impossibility of life after death is truth, because it is a strategy to reduce the morale of happier people.

I asked him what people should think of those who come to the bizarre conclusions like what he had just done, but to this he simply smiled and told me to again consider the throwing of the dice he was given by the merchant; it was at this point he gave the dice to me as a parting gift. Socrates then said he must prepare his shawl for his death in the morning and that it was time for our last goodbye, probably for ever. He suggested though that this was not such a terrible thing if childhood and guardianship lasted forever, if the possibility of being loved and being able to love lasted forever…

After our final embrace, I left the jail and retired to my quarters. I cried with such pain that evening and could not attend my friend’s execution, or ever again consider the madness of my friend at that time, all his senses lost due to his pending demise. Finally, I threw Socrates’ dice in the river and prayed for his eternity with ‘his’ mind and ‘his’ love and that I should see him again, old and wise and beautiful, like I remembered him as being.

Philosophy


Is not philosophy the practice of death? 

(Socrates)

















Looking at the stars always makes me dream.  
Why, I ask myself, shouldn’t the shining dots of the sky 
Be as accessible as the black dots on the map of France? 
Just as we take the train to get to Tarascon or Rouen, 
We take death to reach a star. 

(Vincent van Gogh)

 
I

If you were granted one wish in relation to death,
Would that wish be for reincarnation?

In the consideration of my perceived death,
Either there will be reincarnation,
Or there will not be reincarnation.

Simply because there is a possibility
There might be reincarnation,
Means there may be a further consequence
Of there being poverty on the Earth,
Because however small the probability
I might be reborn into poverty on the Earth

And in considering the starry night,
I hope other conscious life-forms
Are understanding this the same as me
And acting upon their understanding,
Because if there were reincarnation,
It would perhaps not be upon this Earth,
But might well be upon another Earth
Where it were possible for there to be another Earth,

An Earth of which I could only hope was free from poverty,
For even if I had all the riches that I wanted,
I’d still wish reincarnation for eternity
Onto Earths of non-poverty, democracy and opportunity
To protect and preserve continuity.


II

If you were granted one wish in relation to death,
Would that wish be for resurrection?
 
I imagine, in resurrection I have lived for a million years,
The same people, the same places
Fill my head and I pine for rebirth
And not this throbbing mind of memory,
A supposed bliss, yet absent of opportunity
To protect and preserve as necessity.

Oh, how a million years ago,
I would have wished to be
Just born again anew
On planets behind the stars
And to travel the galaxies
Sensing evolution’s infinite possibilities…

With only one desire
And that to be free to do as I choose,
I would need Earths of non-poverty and democracy
Simply for cosmological travel insurance!

But of course, I seem mortal
And while I hope there is no way
To send me to the imagined hell,
I also hope for nature to reawaken me,
Regardless of my morality
And in strict accordance
With my favoured explanatory:

Because there is incarnation,
Is there not reincarnation
And for eternity?


*

The above is an abridged version of Philosophy (The Love of Wisdom), available to preview in it entirety and purchase as a hardcover dust-jacket book here

The Genie

‘Know Thyself’ (Thales)
 

I couldn’t believe my luck when I rubbed the lamp and a genie popped out and so our conversation began.


Genie: I can grant you one wish sir…


Me: Come on mate, I’ve read the books, I should get at least three wishes!


Genie: Look, you’re lucky I popped out at all, you shall only get one wish and not only that but your wish must be understood by me so I can carry it out.


Me: Well that’s fine, I’ve spent my life working in an antique shop and have rubbed literally thousands of lamps in anticipation of this moment. My wish is simple, I want conscious entities to be subject to metaphysical will to evolutionary consciousness independent of a moralising agency!


Genie: Of course I can do anything you ask but I don’t quite understand, please explain what you mean.


Me: Well what this would mean for me and all beings that have the ability to experience consciousness in the natural course of their lives, is that when they die they are born into the next available body brought into the universe that is able to experience consciousness and because my wish is metaphysical will to evolutionary consciousness this will happen indefinitely and what is important is that this rule of nature means that all knowledge of past lives is lost in death. I feel this is important because whatever happens to us in this life, however which way we die, it would not be good to know of our death or to remember the people we would never again see.


Genie: This is fine, I understand, but I do wonder why you don’t just ask for Heaven for everyone?


Me: Genie, what I describe is Heaven for everyone! I cannot conceive anything better than the ability to experience evolution for an eternal duration.


Genie: But what about evil and pain which are prevalent on evolutionary Earths?


Me: Evil and pain do exist and this is tragic, but for consciousness to exist in evolutionary development  this immediately implies there is the ability to understand that others can feel pain and so conscientiousness is the twin that is born at the same time as consciousness and so the opportunity to reduce evil and pain exists with consciousness at all times.


Genie: What about poverty on Earths?


Me: The removal of poverty is something than can be done if there is the will to do it, it is not evolution’s fault there is poverty, it is only ours and because there is conscientiousness poverty can be eradicated.


Genie:  True I guess, ok, I can do this.


Pause


Genie: It is done, because of the nature of your wish you just have to trust I have rendered it the reality and because you chose something spiritual and not material, no-one will ever believe it has been achieved.


Me: This is true, but that’s ok, I mean even if you didn’t complete your end of the bargain at least I can reflect upon the fact there is the hope it is true and that’s pretty satisfying. In fact, the truth is,  it is best I don’t know whether you actioned it or not, because if you did and everyone knew this, there would be cosmic chaos as when the going got tough people would just commit suicide to escape a difficult Earth and there would therefore never be progress past a prehistoric existence. Ha-ha, this is a by-product of my wish and I suppose my second wish if I had one, I mean for it never to be known to be the truth through the scientific method or any other means.


Genie: Indeed. Ok , I must now go back to the bottom of the lamp, but it has been good doing business with you. I’ll be honest in fact, you’ve swayed me, I think I’ll retire now as I wouldn’t want anyone to give me another wish and therefore overrule yours. Hee-hee, seems you have in the end had three wishes come true, because I won’t let anyone else have a wish subsequent to yours.


Me: Funky chickens! You have made my life genie, thank-you and goodnight.


On placing the lid back upon the lamp, my encounter with the genie was over and I went and made myself a nice cup of tea.